View
Search

One European Newspaper Called the Idea of a Palin Presidency a "Half-Baked Alaskan Nightmare."

Oct 17, 2008 7:33 PM by Discussion: Community

One European newspaper called the idea of a Palin presidency a "half-baked Alaskan nightmare."

Things started quite well, with the curiosity factor. To many Europeans there is something exotic about snowy Alaska. Viewers and readers were intrigued by the shots of the outdoorswoman with her eyes squinting fixed along a gun barrel, the thought of a vice president who had once been a beauty queen.

Columnists were approving that here, for once, was a politician in the higher reaches who probably actually knew the price of a loaf and a pint of milk. Women writers in particular responded warmly to her joke about the difference between a pitbull and a hockey mom --"Lipstick."

But soon the carping began, and it was not confined to what U.S. rightists like to dismiss as the "liberal media elite."

We were, the Irish Times warned, "just a heartbeat away from the biggest half-baked Alaskan nightmare." Britain's Financial Times said his selection of vice president raised serious questions about John McCain's judgment and added: "The Palin appointment is yet more proof of the way that abortion still dominates American politics."

Prominence was given to an onslaught on Palin's environmental and animal rights record by veteran ex-film star Brigitte Bardot. Spain's left wing El Pais described Palin as "a figure who comes from the America that is farthest removed from and incomprehensible to the European spectator."

Since then the scorn has been constant, the jokes unrelenting, the YouTube exposure devastating. But let us dispel one bit of nonsense from the start. It is nothing to do with Sarah Palin being of the feminine gender.

Europeans have been astonished that America has never had a woman president. After all we in Britain elected the redoubtable Margaret Thatcher three times as prime minister. Norway did the same with Gro Harlem Brundtland. Germany has a female chancellor, Angela Merkel, even if she does tend to underline the remark I once heard from a British Ambassador: "A German joke is no laughing matter."

Nicolas Sarkozy's socialist challenger for the French presidency was the elegant Segolene Royal.

When Sarah Palin first became McCain's running mate there were even headlines in some British media suggesting that America had found its own Margaret Thatcher.

That certainly was overdoing it. So much so that after 20 years close up reporting on the original I can't resist the temptation to paraphrase Lloyd Bentsen's comment when Dan Quayle unwisely compared himself to John F. Kennedy. "I've interviewed Margaret Thatcher, Governor Palin and I can tell you that you are no Margaret Thatcher."

No, the problem for Sarah Palin in terms of her acceptance in Europe has been the deep wave of Obamamania that had already swept through the European media before her appointment, the self-inflicted wounds of her early media appearances and the apparent box-ticking cynicism of her choice.

That was summed up for some by the appearance of those women at McCain rallies wearing T-shirts emblazoned "Small Town Gun-Totin Christians for McCain."

For Europeans, who were alienated during George W. Bush's first four years by a president who showed little interest in their continent and patently cared nothing for the opinions of its leaders, the turning point probably came with the appearance on the Katie Couric show when Palin confessed to not having had a passport until 2006.

Europeans are appalled at the thought that someone who wants to be vice president of the most powerful nation on earth had so little interest in the rest of a world which is so vitally affected by the decisions of the man, or woman, in the White House.

And they are not much impressed by explanations that her parents did not have the money to send her on a fact-finding tour of the world as a student. Anybody with the money to own an SUV, hunt moose and drive a snowmobile has the money to travel.

It was the American Mark Twain who reminded us all that "travel is fatal to prejudice, bigotry and narrow-mindedness." If Sarah Palin wanted to be loved in Europe she should have got about a bit.

10 Replies Reply 3 Referrals

Assessments of the Most Recent Presidential Debate are Grim;under a picture of Barack Obama and John McCain squared off in Tennessee, the Drudge Report presented a single-word critique: "Boring." Politico is calling it the "worst debate ever."

Oct 9, 2008 2:40 PM by Discussion: Internet

VP Candidates

The negative general consensus about the debate is summed up tidily in the Times of London's "Gnawingly dull debate won't halt the Obama Tide":

Senator Obama – you may be shocked to hear - promised tax cuts for working people; universal health care, an end to financial deregulation, the winding down of the war in Iraq, a renewed commitment to the war in Afghanistan and an America that is liked by the world. Senator McCain – in case you hadn’t heard – is a Republican who will continue the failed policies of George Bush.

For his part Senator McCain insisted he was – wait for it – a reformer who would reform Washington, end corruption on Wall Street, drill for oil, win the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and robustly defend America’s interests. Senator Obama, he gravely reminded the audience, could not be trusted because he didn’t have the experience or the judgment.

Most media outlets, it seems, are peeved at the fact that the candidates strictly stuck to their talking points, despite the fact that doing so mitigates the strength of a debate, making it sanitary and common. It's a reasonable contention; but we've got one question: what campaign has everyone else been following up until now?

Sarah Palin dodged every single question in the VP debate, choosing instead to rattle off prepackaged quotes like she was performing a 10th grade book report. Where was the bored media's ire then? Instead, David Brooks of the New York Times said Palin "held up her end of an energetic debate that gave voters a direct look at two competing philosophies." WTF? What philosophy was that, Brooksy? She gave a shout-out to third graders! Sorry to break it to you, everyone, but our politicians now feel that they are above speaking to us honestly. And you know why they think they can do that? Because we don't really make a big deal out of it when they do, because we sit on our asses and allow columnists in the "paper of record" to call them "direct" when we know damn well that they're anything but.

And is everyone authentically shocked that the presidential candidates rarely veer away from their main points (ie Obama: "I was once poor," McCain: "I'm not a sissy lawyer") anymore? This is the final month before the most important election in decades, one in which the slightest verbal or physical mistake has been uploaded to YouTube instantly. Nobody's going to risk shooting from the hip and ending up with a macaca-gate on their hands—or worse, another Palin-style meltdown about Alaskan airspace. For the next thirty days, Obama and McCain are like spiders: more scared of you than you are of them.

And another thing…

The CNN coverage of the debates, with the charts and the graphs and the viewer response lines? That crap needs to end. Have we really reached a point in our zeitgeist where people can't sit and watch two of the most powerful men in the whole world talk about decisions that will effect billions of dollars and people without video games cluttering the screen? Are we that gone on sugar and Ritalin and cocaine?

By framing the debates in useless nonsense, CNN and their ilk are not only distracting voters from what's being said, they're also distracting them from stuff that's actually important to watch when attempting to discern what kind of person a candidate is, their verbal patterns and subtle physical tics.

It's called paying attention, and it's how millions of Americans at bars every night choose who they're going to do the bonedance with. Why can't everyone apply the same level of interest to two men they really don't want to be cornholed by.

30 Replies Reply 17 Referrals

Palin Represents ‘Fatal Cancer’ to GOP, Top Conservative Pundit Says

Oct 8, 2008 10:56 PM by Discussion: Internet

FrankenbarbieConservative New York Times columnist David Brooks, who has expressed doubts about Sarah Palin's readiness to serve as vice president, said this week the Alaska governor represents a fatal cancer to the Republican Party

From

(CNN) – Conservative New York Times columnist David Brooks, who has expressed doubts about Sarah Palin’s readiness to serve as vice president, said this week the Alaska governor “represents a fatal cancer to the Republican Party.”

Brooks praised Palin’s debate performance and called her a natural political talent, but told a New York audience Monday that “experience matters”: “Do I think she’s ready to be president or vice president? No, she’s not even close to that,” he said.

“…Reagan had an immense faith in the power of ideas,” he also said, in remarks first reported by the Huffington Post. “But there has been a counter, more populist tradition, which is not only to scorn liberal ideas, but to scorn ideas entirely. And I'm afraid that Sarah Palin has those prejudices. I think President Bush has those prejudices."

 

Other prominent conservatives, including George Will and David Frum, have publicly questioned Palin's readiness to be vice president. Prominent conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, an early supporter, said late last month that recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party.

Brooks himself has also written skeptically about Palin. "Sarah Palin has many virtues," he wrote in a recent column. "If you wanted someone to destroy a corrupt establishment, she'd be your woman. But the constructive act of governance is another matter. She has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, she seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness."

357 Replies Reply 58 Referrals

small Louisiana community built to house displaced New Orleans residents two years on

Aug 28, 2007 6:01 PM by Discussion: Internet
Magnaville - dubbed Canadaville by residents, was created by Frank Stronach, chairman of auto parts company Magna International. The magnate bought 369 hectares of land, outside Simmesport, a small town in Louisiana, 240 kilometres north of New Orleans in an effort on the part of the magnate to help people displaced by Hurricane Katrina which hit the Gulf Coast on August 29, 2005. Dennis Mills, president of the Magnaville project, appeared on Canada AM on Tuesday, Aug. 28, 2007 to discuss the development

The Globe and Mail

0 Replies Reply 18 Referrals

The industry's dilemma might be a lot more manageable today if it hadn't been so late to embrace digital music

Aug 28, 2007 5:15 PM by Discussion: Internet

The Globe and Mail WASHINGTON — The end of summer means back to school for millions of college students across North America. But welcome week won't be much fun for at least 500 students at some of the best U.S. schools.

Waiting on campus for these chosen ones are special "prelitigation" settlement offers from the Recording Industry Association of America.

The latest flurry of legal letters is part of a crackdown by the major music labels, targeting heavy downloaders who use powerful university computer networks to swap songs.

The recipients - at schools ranging from tiny Bryn Mawr College to sprawling UCLA - have an "opportunity" to resolve legal claims at a "discounted rate" - typically about $3000 (U.S.) - before they're hit with a formal copyright lawsuit, according to the RIAA.

The message: Settle now or face hefty legal bills down the road. Going after a few hundred students may seem like legal overkill, but new research suggests piracy has become a threat, not just to the industry, but to the overall U.S. economy.

The annual drain on the economy includes $12.5-billion in output, 71,060 jobs and $422-million in federal, state and local taxes, according to a new study by Stephen Siwek of the Institute for Policy Innovation.

The true cost of sound-recording piracy far exceeds its impact on U.S. producers and distributors ..." the study concludes.

 "Piracy harms not only the owners of intellectual property, but also U.S. consumers and taxpayers." Indeed, Mr. Siwek argues that the direct effects - lost CD sales for retailers and record companies - understates the true cost by half.

He says a multiplier effect swells the final tally as the industry's losses ripple through the economy via lost jobs and wages.

 "This report echoes the sentiment of other economic analyses, namely that there exists a tangible harm from music piracy," says intellectual property lawyer Alan Fisch of Kaye Scholer LLP in Washington, D.C. "Efforts to reduce music piracy must continue to focus on both the supply of and the demand for bootlegged works.

" The industry isn't relying solely on litigation, which began with its pursuit of Napster and other peer-to-peer computer networks seven years ago.

 On the supply side, the industry is belatedly getting its head around the idea that it can be a player in the distribution of digital music, not just a purveyor of hard-copy CDs.

 Six years after the iPod and more than a decade after computer users started swapping digital music files over networks, the digital music market seems to be slowly opening up. Universal Music Group, the leading music company, announced earlier this month that it has begun "testing" digital sales of copy-protection-free songs in MP3 format through major online retailers, including Wal-Mart, Best Buy, Amazon.com and Rhapsody.

The arrangement means buyers will be able to load those files onto any device they like. Unlike Apple Inc.'s iTunes online store, the music can be played on any MP3 and will cost a few cents less a song.

 Separately, RealNetworks said last week that it's merging its subscription-based Rhapsody music service with MTV's Urge music store and Verizon Wireless's V-Cast, which offers song downloads for cellphones.

All this opens up new, legal ways for people to acquire and own music. But the industry is already very late to the game. MP3 players, cellphones, fast Internet, and cheap mass storage devices have revolutionized the way people listen to, share and acquire music.

And record companies continue to maintain roadblocks to buying music legally. Most songs purchased anywhere other than on iTunes can't be played on iPods - the dominant MP3 player - because of embedded copyright protections.

Consumers may also find the latest Universal test unsatisfying. It only involves songs from Universal artists, and even then, only part of the company's vast collection.

And it's only for a limited time (until January, 2008) as the company assesses the impact on piracy and sales. For years, the recording industry focused almost exclusively on trying to stamp out piracy by suppressing demand through lawsuits. And it's their right to continue to do so.The

industry's dilemma might be a lot more manageable today if it hadn't been so late to embrace digital music as the innovation that it is, rather than a threat to be thwarted at every turn. The Globe and Mail 

11 Replies Reply 21 Referrals

Pahleez Advise How One Goes About Backing THESE Up

Aug 21, 2007 10:48 PM by Discussion: Windows XP
hey : trying to back up custom emoticons acquired chatting w friends on Messenger + no search of .gifs, local settings, documents + settings, emoticons in 'search' or in the 3 program groups related to Messenger revealed where these images are stored after 'adding'....any direction in this regard would be greatly appreciated as I would be at a loss if ever upgrading or 'restoring' to ever replace some of them w/o an existing backup...thx
2 Replies Reply 16 Referrals

From the Desk of David Pogue;New York Times

Apr 26, 2007 10:01 PM by Discussion: Community

When I was just out of college in the late 1980's, I made a lot of computer house calls in New York (all right, apartment calls). During those years, I learned an awful lot about people and the dichotomy between their public and private personalities. 

One client in particular has never left my mind. She was a wealthy woman with an astonishingly huge apartment -- and an astonishingly sour personality.Whenever menials like me were around, she played a game whose name, I now realize, was "You're Wrong."

It began the moment she answered the doorbell. "Well, don't just stand there like a mannequin. I'm not paying you $25 an hour to just stand there. Go inside."

So, mumbling apologies, I entered the apartment and set down my bag next to the computer desk.

"Not there, not there!" she shrieked. "You'll get dirt on the carpet! Put it out there in the pantry. Have some respect for people's things!"

If I then reached to turn on the computer, it was, "Don't do it yourself! How do you expect me to learn if you do everything for me? Don't treat me like I'm some kind of idiot!"

But if, on the next visit, I invited her to turn on the machine herself, she shot back, "How should I know how to turn it on? If I knew how to use the computer already, I wouldn't be paying you $25 an hour, now would I?"

No matter what you said, on any subject, no matter how neutral, Mrs. Cronkwitz could find fault with it. (Yes, this was the same woman who berated me for suggesting that her daisy-wheel printer couldn't print graphics.) Her simple rule was: "If you can't say something negative, don't say it at all."

I think about Mrs. Cronkwitz's game every time I read the comments on any online forum that accepts anonymous postings, like Digg.com or YouTube. It's all a big contest to see who can spit with the most venom on any product, any idea, any topic.

Just once, I'd love to see how many products, ideas and topics these people come up with themselves. (Actually, I already know: None, because most of 'em are still in high school.)

All of which brings me to the Kathy Sierra story, which The Times recently covered.

In short, a computer-book author named Kathy Sierra wrote, on her blog, about whether it's OK to delete nasty comments left by your readers. Anonymous commenters descended on her with vicious, violent and even sexual comments and threats, complete with vulgar Photoshopped images of Ms. Sierra.

Anyway, Tim O'Reilly, the publisher of her computer books (and mine, by the way), responded with a proposal on his own blog: a voluntary, seven-step blogger code of conduct.

There's room for argument over some of his points -- true to form, most bloggers' first reaction was to criticize it -- but one point, I think, is unassailable:

"3. Consider eliminating anonymous comments."

That's it, baby. People don't go to psychotic extremes when their names or e-mail addresses are visible.

Just look at the reviews for books and products on Amazon.com. They prove that it's perfectly possible to express dislike of something without spewing hatred. And if you've signed your name, you're a *heck* of a lot less likely to do that.

For the record, my assistant and I moderate the comments on my own blog. Criticism, snarkiness and anti-Pogue comments are all permitted. The only things we delete are off-topic political diatribes, vulgar language, and spam. Yes, spam; you have no idea how many spammers seem to think that a tech blog is the place to find customers for Cialis and Viagra.

(OK, Amazon deletes vulgar and abusive comments, too. But I'll bet that it amounts to only a small percentage of submissions, just as we delete only about 1 in 1,000 Pogue's Posts comments for offensiveness.)

The quality of the discussion at nytimes.com/pogue is very, very high, as a number of readers have noted with delight. I think the biggest reason is that on this blog, readers don't feel anonymous. Your comment is posted under a nickname, but you're nonetheless aware that we know who you are; after all, you've signed up for free nytimes.com registration. Plenty of Pogue's Post readers even use their real names as their nicknames.

And why not? If you're proud of your thoughts, why would you be afraid to be associated with them?

Yes, I know, there are exceptions; certain blog topics have good reasons for offering anonymity (spouse-abuse forums, HIV sites and so on). I'm not suggesting that *all* blogs eliminate anonymity.

Nor am I suggesting censorship. As Tim O'Reilly put it: "I'm not suggesting that every blog will want to delete such comments, but I am suggesting that blogs that do want to keep the level of dialog at a higher level not be censured for doing so.

"There are many real-world analogies. Shock radio hosts encourage abusive callers; a mainstream talk radio show like NPR's Talk of the Nation wouldn't hesitate to cut someone off who started spewing hatred and abuse. Frat parties might encourage drunken lewdness, but a party at a tech conference would not. Setting standards for acceptable behavior in a forum you control is conducive to free speech, not damaging to it."

I'm just observing that the blogs with the best and most intelligent discussion are the ones where postings aren't anonymous -- and vice versa. Over and over again, the sites that permit anonymous pot shots are the ones that seem populated solely by Mrs. Cronkwitz and her clones.

* * *

(P.S.-- On a totally different, much cheerier subject, a number of readers have asked whatever became of "It's All Geek to Me," the six-episode TV series I wrote and hosted that was supposed to air in April.

The show has finally been blessed with a firm broadcast schedule: Friday nights at 8 p.m., beginning May 18.

Each week, they'll air one new episode and one re-run, on two channels: Discovery HD and The Science Channel. Both of these channels require either a digital cable box -- you can upgrade to one through your cable company, if you haven't already -- or satellite. Whether the episodes will be available for Internet download hasn't yet been determined.)

13 Replies Reply 5 Referrals

Honda Accord's 'The Cog'

May 5, 2006 6:49 PM by Discussion: WinCustomize Talk
...and you thought those people that set up roomfuls of dominos to knock over
were amazing. There are no computer graphics or digital tricks in the film.
Everything you see really happened in real time exactly as you see it.

The film took 606 takes. On the first 605 takes, something, usually very
minor, didn't work. They would then have to set the whole thing up again.

The crew spent weeks shooting night and day. By the time it was over, they
were ready to change professions. The film cost six million dollars and took three months to complete
including full engineering of the sequence. In addition, it's two minutes
long so every time Honda airs the film on British television, they're
shelling out enough dough to keep any one of us in clover for a lifetime.

However, it is fast becoming the most downloaded advertisement in internet
history. Honda executives figure the ad will soon pay for itself simply in
"free viewings" (Honda isn't paying a dime to have you watch this
commercial!).

When the ad was pitched to senior executives, they signed off on it
immediately without any hesitation - including the costs.

There are six and only six hand-made Honda Accords in the world. To the
horror of Honda engineers, the filmmakers disassembled two of them to make
the film.

Everything you see in the film (aside from the walls, floor, ramp, and
complete Honda Accord) is parts from those two cars.

The voiceover is Garrison Keillor. When the ad was shown to Honda
executives, they liked it and commented on how amazing computer graphics
have gotten.

They fell off their chairs when they found out it was for real. Oh, and
about those funky windshield wipers. On the new Accords, the windshield
wipers have water sensors and are designed to start doing their thing
automatically as soon as they become wet.
6 Replies Reply 4 Referrals

U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act: One of the World's Most Draconian Pieces of Intellectual-Property Law

Apr 27, 2006 11:55 AM by Discussion: Community
Artists revolt against CRIA policies

JACK KAPICA

Globe and Mail Update
The music recording industry will no longer be able to present the united front it claimed to have on copyright issues, after a group of prominent musicians and singers this morning announced an association whose philosophy is at odds with the Canadian Recording Industry Association.

The group, called the Canadian Music Creators Coalition, says they got together because the recording industry seldom speaks for recording artists.

"Record companies and music publishers are not our enemies," the coalition said in a statement released this morning, "but let's be clear: Lobbyists for major labels are looking out for their shareholders, and seldom speak for Canadian artists."

The new group's membership includes the Barenaked Ladies, Avril Lavigne, Sarah McLachlan, Chantal Kreviazuk, Sum 41, Stars, Raine Maida (Our Lady Peace), Dave Bidini (Rheostatics), Billy Talent, John K. Samson (Weakerthans), Broken Social Scene, Sloan, Andrew Cash and Bob Wiseman (co-founder of Blue Rodeo).

The group opposes demands of the recording industry for major changes in the Canadian Copyright Act. The former Liberal government had tabled an amendment to the act that was heavily influenced by demands from the recording industry.

The bill died on the order paper when the government fell, and the bill's champion, Liberal MP Sarmite Bulte, went down to defeat in the subsequent election amid accusations of catering to the CRIA.

In the wake of the bill, recording artists felt their views had been ignored by the Canadian Recording Industry Association, and sought to form a coalition that would represent their needs in the copyright debate.

The CMCC has a common goal of "having our voices heard about the laws and policies that affect our livelihoods.

"We are the people who actually create Canadian music. Without us, there would be no music for copyright laws to protect."

The CMCC says it's the government's responsibility to protect Canadian artists from exploitation, and calls for "a firm commitment to programs that support Canadian music talent, and a fresh approach to copyright law reform."

The coalition parts company with the recording industry in three major areas.

It calls the lawsuits the industry wants to launch against those who download music free from the Internet "destructive and hypocritical," and opposes any copyright reform that that would make it easier for the recording industry to sue the fans.

It condemns digital copyright protection measures as "risky and counterproductive," and opposes the criminalization of any attempt to circumvent them, a provision that exists in the U.S. Digital Millennium Copyright Act, one of the world's most draconian pieces of intellectual-property law.

The CMCC also demands that any copyright reform should support the musicians and artists, not the record labels themselves.

The creation of the CMCC is not the first setback suffered by the Canadian Recording Industry Association recently. The independent label Nettwerk, which records Sarah McLachlan and the Barenaked Ladies, spoke out against CRIA's policy of suing people who share music files.

Six of Canada's leading independent record labels — Anthem Records, Aquarius Records, The Children's Group, Linus Entertainment, Nettwerk Records and True North Records — pulled out of the CRIA this month.

In a letter to CRIA president Graham Henderson, the six labels said that "it has become increasingly clear over the past few months that CRIA's position on several important music industry issues [is] not aligned with our best interests as independent recording companies.

"We do not feel that we can remain members given CRIA's decision to advocate solely on behalf of the four major foreign multi-national labels," the letter said.

The six companies then threw their support behind the Canadian Independent Record Production Association (CIRPA).

In another setback, the CRIA recently commissioned a study, conducted by the Pollara market-research group, on the downloading habits of Canadian music consumers. The study failed to prove that peer-to-peer file-sharing technology is devastating the music industry.

The Pollara study concluded that Internet downloading constitutes less than a third of the music on downloaders' computers, that downloaders use the downloaded versions as a sample before they decide to buy the music, and that the largest downloader demographic is also the largest music-buying demographic.

The CMCC was blunt in its criticism of the recording industry "has been suing our fans against our will, and laws enabling these suits cannot be justified in our names .... The government should repeal provisions of the Copyright Act that allow labels to unfairly punish fans who share music for non-commercial purposes."

The government, the CMCC continued, "should not blindly implement decade-old treaties designed to give control to major labels and take choices away from artists and consumers."

It also says that consumers should be able to transfer the music they buy to other formats under a right of fair use, without having to pay twice."
0 Replies Reply 4 Referrals

WeatherSix support for locations in Canada

Jun 20, 2005 3:27 AM by Discussion: Internet
CAXX0001 - Abbotsford CAXX0002 - Agassiz CAXX0003 - Ahousat CAXX0004 - Airdrie CAXX0005 - Ajax CAXX0007 - Albertville CAXX0008 - Amherst CAXX0009 - Amherstburg CAXX0010 - Anzac CAXX0011 - Arborg CAXX0596 - Argentia CAXX0012 - Ascot Corner CAXX0013 - Ashville CAXX0014 - Atikokan CAXX0015 - Aylesford CAXX0016 - Aylmer CAXX0017 - Baden CAXX0580 - Badger CAXX0018 - Bagotville CAXX0019 - Baie-Comeau CAXX0020 - Baie-Saint-Paul CAXX0021 - Baker Lake CAXX0022 - Bala CAXX0023 - Banff CAXX0024 - Barachois CAXX0025 - Barrie CAXX0026 - Bayfield CAXX0027 - Beamsville CAXX0028 - Beauport CAXX0029 - Beausejour CAXX0030 - Beaver Cove CAXX0031 - Becancour CAXX0032 - Bedford CAXX0033 - Belcourt CAXX0034 - Belleville CAXX0035 - Belmont CAXX0036 - Big Brook CAXX0604 - Big Trout Lake CAXX0037 - Birch Hills CAXX0038 - Birken CAXX0597 - Blanc Sablon CAXX0039 - Bloedel CAXX0576 - Bonavista CAXX0040 - Boucherville CAXX0041 - Bowmanville CAXX0042 - Bracebridge CAXX0043 - Brampton CAXX0044 - Brandon CAXX0045 - Brantford CAXX0046 - Brighton CAXX0607 - Broadview CAXX0047 - Bromptonville CAXX0048 - Bruce Mines CAXX0561 - Buffalo Narrows CAXX0575 - Burgeo CAXX0049 - Burin CAXX0050 - Burlington CAXX0051 - Burnaby CAXX0052 - Bylot CAXX0053 - Cacouna CAXX0054 - Calgary CAXX0055 - Callander CAXX0056 - Cambridge CAXX0057 - Campbell River CAXX0058 - Campbellton CAXX0059 - Canmore CAXX0060 - Cap Chat CAXX0061 - Cap-de-la-Madeleine CAXX0062 - Cap-des-Rosiers CAXX0617 - Cape Dorset CAXX0063 - Carcross CAXX0064 - Caronport CAXX0065 - Carp CAXX0601 - Cartwright CAXX0066 - Castlegar CAXX0067 - Castor CAXX0068 - Chambord CAXX0069 - Champagne CAXX0070 - Chapais CAXX0071 - Charlesbourg CAXX0072 - Charlie Lake CAXX0073 - Charlottetown CAXX0074 - Chatham CAXX0075 - Chibougamau CAXX0076 - Chicoutimi CAXX0077 - Chilliwack CAXX0078 - Churchill CAXX0574 - Churchill Falls CAXX0079 - Chute-aux-Outardes CAXX0080 - Clairmont CAXX0081 - Clarke City CAXX0082 - Clinton CAXX0083 - Coal Harbour CAXX0084 - Coaldale CAXX0085 - Cobden CAXX0086 - Cochrane CAXX0087 - Codroy CAXX0088 - Colborne CAXX0089 - Cold Lake CAXX0090 - Collingwood CAXX0091 - Collins Bay CAXX0092 - Comox CAXX0093 - Coniston CAXX0094 - Copper Cliff CAXX0095 - Copper Creek CAXX0618 - Coral Harbour CAXX0096 - Cormorant CAXX0097 - Corner Brook CAXX0098 - Coronation CAXX0099 - Courtenay CAXX0100 - Courtright CAXX0101 - Cranberry Portage CAXX0102 - Cranbrook CAXX0103 - Cumberland CAXX0104 - Cut Knife CAXX0105 - Dafoe CAXX0106 - Dalhousie CAXX0107 - Dartmouth CAXX0108 - Dauphin CAXX0109 - Dawson CAXX0110 - Dawson Creek CAXX0111 - Debert CAXX0112 - Deer Lake CAXX0113 - Delhi CAXX0114 - Denfield CAXX0115 - Denholm CAXX0116 - Deroche CAXX0117 - Devon CAXX0118 - Dieppe CAXX0119 - Digges CAXX0120 - Dominion CAXX0121 - Douglastown CAXX0122 - Dundas CAXX0123 - Dunmore CAXX0628 - Earlton CAXX0124 - East Point CAXX0569 - Eastend Cypress CAXX0125 - Echo Bay CAXX0126 - Edmonton CAXX0567 - Edmonton International CAXX0565 - Edmonton Namao Alta. CAXX0564 - Edmonton Stony Plain Alta. CAXX0127 - Edmundston CAXX0128 - Edson CAXX0129 - Elliot Lake CAXX0130 - Elmsdale CAXX0131 - Enderby CAXX0132 - Esquimalt CAXX0133 - Essex CAXX0134 - Estevan CAXX0612 - Estevan Point CAXX0135 - Ethelbert CAXX0136 - Etobicoke CAXX0137 - Fairmont Hot Springs CAXX0138 - Falconbridge CAXX0139 - Fiske CAXX0140 - Flaxcombe CAXX0141 - Flin Flon CAXX0142 - Floral CAXX0620 - Fort Chipewyan CAXX0143 - Fort Erie CAXX0144 - Fort Frances CAXX0145 - Fort MacKay CAXX0146 - Fort McMurray CAXX0147 - Fort Nelson CAXX0560 - Fort Reliance CAXX0148 - Fort Saint John CAXX0149 - Fort Saskatchewan CAXX0624 - Fort Simpson CAXX0621 - Fort Smith CAXX0150 - Fort Steele CAXX0151 - Fredericton CAXX0152 - Freshford CAXX0153 - Gambo CAXX0154 - Gananoque CAXX0155 - Gander CAXX0156 - Garibaldi CAXX0157 - Gaspe CAXX0158 - Gatineau CAXX0159 - Geraldton CAXX0160 - Gillam CAXX0161 - Gimli CAXX0162 - Glace Bay CAXX0163 - Glenwood CAXX0164 - Godbout CAXX0165 - Goderich CAXX0166 - Godreau CAXX0167 - Golden CAXX0168 - Goose Bay CAXX0595 - Gore Bay CAXX0169 - Gracefield CAXX0170 - Grand Bay CAXX0171 - Grand Centre CAXX0172 - Grand Coulee CAXX0173 - Grand Falls CAXX0174 - Grand View CAXX0175 - Grande Prairie CAXX0176 - Gravenhurst CAXX0177 - Greenwood CAXX0178 - Grimsby CAXX0179 - Grindrod CAXX0180 - Grosse Isle CAXX0181 - Guelph CAXX0182 - Hague CAXX0183 - Halifax CAXX0184 - Hamilton CAXX0185 - Hampden CAXX0186 - Hampton CAXX0187 - Hanna CAXX0188 - Hare Bay CAXX0189 - Hawk Junction CAXX0190 - Hawk Lake CAXX0622 - Hay River CAXX0191 - Hebron CAXX0630 - High Level CAXX0192 - Hope CAXX0193 - Howley CAXX0609 - Hudson Bay CAXX0194 - Hull CAXX0195 - Ignace CAXX0196 - Iles-de-la-Madeleine CAXX0197 - Ilford CAXX0198 - Ingersoll CAXX0199 - Innisfail CAXX0616 - Inukjuak CAXX0632 - Inuvick CAXX0201 - Invermere CAXX0202 - Iqaluit CAXX0203 - Irvine CAXX0573 - Island Lake CAXX0204 - Isle aux Morts CAXX0205 - Jasper CAXX0206 - Jellicoe CAXX0207 - Joliette CAXX0208 - Jonquiere CAXX0209 - Kakabeka Falls CAXX0210 - Kakawis CAXX0211 - Kamloops CAXX0212 - Kanata CAXX0213 - Kapuskasing CAXX0214 - Keene CAXX0215 - Keewatin CAXX0216 - Kelowna CAXX0217 - Kemnay CAXX0218 - Kenora CAXX0219 - Kentville CAXX0220 - Keswick CAXX0221 - Kildonan CAXX0222 - Kimberley CAXX0223 - Kincardine CAXX0587 - Kindakun Rocks CAXX0224 - Kindersley CAXX0225 - Kingston CAXX0226 - Kinuso CAXX0227 - Kitchener CAXX0228 - Kitscoty CAXX0615 - Kuujjuaq CAXX0614 - Kuujjuarapik CAXX0249 - L'Isle-Verte CAXX0229 - La Baie CAXX0230 - La Corey CAXX0231 - La Grande CAXX0232 - La Malbaie CAXX0233 - La Ronge CAXX0234 - La Salle CAXX0235 - Labrador City CAXX0619 - Lac La Biche CAXX0577 - Lac St. Pierre CAXX0236 - Lachine CAXX0237 - Lacombe CAXX0238 - Lake Louise CAXX0239 - Lakefield CAXX0240 - Lamaline CAXX0613 - Langara CAXX0241 - Langham CAXX0605 - Lansdowne House CAXX0242 - Lashburn CAXX0243 - Laval CAXX0244 - Lawn CAXX0245 - Lennoxville CAXX0246 - Lethbridge CAXX0247 - Levis CAXX0248 - Lions Head CAXX0250 - Lively CAXX0610 - Lloydminister CAXX0251 - Lloydminster CAXX0252 - Lochalsh CAXX0253 - Loggieville CAXX0254 - Lomond CAXX0255 - London CAXX0256 - Longlac CAXX0257 - Longueuil CAXX0258 - Loretteville CAXX0259 - Lucan CAXX0260 - Luceville CAXX0261 - Lumsden CAXX0262 - Lund CAXX0562 - Lynn Lake CAXX0611 - Lytton CAXX0263 - MacAlister CAXX0264 - MacCan CAXX0265 - MacDowall CAXX0266 - MacKenzie CAXX0267 - Magog CAXX0268 - Magrath CAXX0269 - Maitland CAXX0270 - Malartic CAXX0271 - Malton CAXX0272 - Maniwaki CAXX0273 - Markham CAXX0274 - Marlboro CAXX0600 - Mary's Harbour CAXX0275 - Marysville CAXX0276 - Massey CAXX0602 - Matagami CAXX0277 - Matane CAXX0278 - Matapedia CAXX0279 - Mattice CAXX0280 - McGregor CAXX0568 - Meadow Lake CAXX0281 - Meaford CAXX0282 - Medicine Hat CAXX0586 - Melita CAXX0283 - Memramcook CAXX0284 - Merville CAXX0285 - Messines CAXX0286 - Midale CAXX0287 - Middleton CAXX0288 - Midhurst CAXX0289 - Milton CAXX0290 - Minaki CAXX0291 - Mine Centre CAXX0292 - Minnedosa CAXX0293 - Miramichi CAXX0594 - Miscou Island CAXX0294 - Mission CAXX0295 - Mississauga CAXX0296 - Moisie CAXX0297 - Moncton CAXX0299 - Mont-Joli CAXX0300 - Mont-Laurier CAXX0298 - Monte Creek CAXX0301 - Montreal CAXX0302 - Moonbeam CAXX0303 - Mooretown CAXX0304 - Moose Factory CAXX0305 - Moose Jaw CAXX0306 - Moose Lake CAXX0307 - Moose River CAXX0308 - Moosonee CAXX0309 - Morinville CAXX0310 - Mount Pearl CAXX0311 - Mount Stewart CAXX0312 - Mud River CAXX0313 - Nanaimo CAXX0314 - Nanticoke CAXX0598 - Natashquan CAXX0315 - Nelson CAXX0316 - Nelson House CAXX0317 - New Waterford CAXX0318 - New Westminster CAXX0319 - Newcastle CAXX0320 - Nezah CAXX0321 - Niagara Falls CAXX0322 - Nicolet CAXX0323 - Nipigon CAXX0324 - Nobel CAXX0325 - North Battleford CAXX0326 - North Bay CAXX0327 - North Sydney CAXX0328 - North Vancouver CAXX0329 - North West River CAXX0330 - North York CAXX0572 - Norway House CAXX0331 - Notre-Dame-du-Portage CAXX0332 - Oak Bay CAXX0333 - Oakville CAXX0334 - Okanagan Landing CAXX0335 - Okotoks CAXX0336 - Oliver CAXX0337 - Omemee CAXX0338 - One Hundred Fifty Mile House CAXX0339 - Opasatika CAXX0340 - Orillia CAXX0341 - Oromocto CAXX0342 - Oshawa CAXX0343 - Ottawa CAXX0344 - Outremont CAXX0345 - Owen Sound CAXX0346 - Oyama CAXX0347 - Parksville CAXX0348 - Parry Sound CAXX0349 - Parson CAXX0350 - Pasqua CAXX0631 - Peace River CAXX0351 - Peachland CAXX0352 - Peers CAXX0353 - Pemberton CAXX0354 - Pembroke CAXX0355 - Penticton CAXX0356 - Petawawa CAXX0357 - Peterborough CAXX0358 - Pickering CAXX0359 - Pilot Butte CAXX0360 - Point Edward CAXX0361 - Pointe-Lebel CAXX0362 - Port Alberni CAXX0363 - Port Colborne CAXX0364 - Port Coquitlam CAXX0365 - Port Dover CAXX0366 - Port Edward CAXX0367 - Port Essington CAXX0368 - Port Hardy CAXX0369 - Port McNeill CAXX0370 - Port Moody CAXX0371 - Port Simpson CAXX0582 - Port Weller CAXX0373 - Port-Cartier CAXX0372 - Port-aux-Basques CAXX0374 - Pouch Cove CAXX0375 - Powassan CAXX0376 - Powell River CAXX0377 - Preston CAXX0378 - Price CAXX0379 - Prince CAXX0380 - Prince Albert CAXX0381 - Prince George CAXX0382 - Prince Rupert CAXX0383 - Prospector CAXX0629 - Puntzi Mountain CAXX0384 - Qualicum Beach CAXX0385 - Quebec CAXX0386 - Queen Charlotte CAXX0387 - Quinsam CAXX0388 - Radisson CAXX0389 - Radium Hot Springs CAXX0390 - Rae CAXX0391 - Raleigh CAXX0563 - Rankin Inlet CAXX0392 - Raymond CAXX0393 - Read Island CAXX0394 - Red Deer CAXX0606 - Red Lake CAXX0395 - Red Rock CAXX0396 - Redcliff CAXX0397 - Regina CAXX0398 - Revelstoke CAXX0399 - Rhein CAXX0400 - Richmond CAXX0401 - Richmond Hill CAXX0402 - Rimouski CAXX0403 - Riverton CAXX0404 - Riviere-a-Claude CAXX0405 - Riviere-du-Loup CAXX0406 - Roberval CAXX0570 - Rockglen CAXX0407 - Rolla CAXX0408 - Rose Blanche CAXX0409 - Rosetown CAXX0590 - Rosetown East CAXX0410 - Rossland CAXX0411 - Rothesay CAXX0412 - Saanich CAXX0591 - Sable Island CAXX0413 - Sackville CAXX0414 - Saint Albert CAXX0415 - Saint Anthony CAXX0416 - Saint Catharines CAXX0417 - Saint Catharines Arpt CAXX0418 - Saint Eleanors CAXX0419 - Saint John CAXX0421 - Saint Lawrence CAXX0422 - Saint Leonard CAXX0423 - Saint Louis CAXX0424 - Saint Marys CAXX0428 - Saint-Eustache CAXX0429 - Saint-Felicien CAXX0430 - Saint-Hubert CAXX0431 - Saint-Irenee CAXX0432 - Saint-Jacques CAXX0433 - Saint-Jovite CAXX0434 - Saint-Prime CAXX0435 - Saint-Simeon CAXX0425 - Sainte-Catherine CAXX0426 - Sainte-Felicite CAXX0427 - Sainte-Foy CAXX0437 - Salmon Arm CAXX0438 - Salmon Valley CAXX0439 - Saltcoats CAXX0440 - Sandspit CAXX0441 - Sarnia CAXX0442 - Saskatoon CAXX0443 - Sault Ste Marie CAXX0444 - Savona CAXX0445 - Scarborough CAXX0446 - Schefferville CAXX0447 - Schumacher CAXX0448 - Selkirk CAXX0449 - Sept-Iles CAXX0450 - Sevenpersons CAXX0451 - Sexsmith CAXX0452 - Shawanga CAXX0592 - Shearwater CAXX0453 - Shediac CAXX0454 - Sherbrooke CAXX0455 - Sidney CAXX0456 - Sillery CAXX0457 - Simcoe CAXX0603 - Sioux Lookout CAXX0458 - Sipiwesk CAXX0459 - Skidegate CAXX0460 - Slave Lake CAXX0461 - Smithers CAXX0462 - Snake River CAXX0463 - Soda Creek CAXX0464 - Sorel CAXX0465 - Sorrento CAXX0466 - Souris CAXX0467 - South Porcupine CAXX0468 - Spanish CAXX0469 - Spragge CAXX0470 - Springhill CAXX0471 - Spruce Grove CAXX0472 - Spurfield CAXX0579 - Squamish Airport CAXX0420 - St. John's CAXX0593 - St. Stephen CAXX0473 - Stanley Mission CAXX0474 - Stayner CAXX0475 - Stephenville CAXX0476 - Stillwater CAXX0477 - Stonewall CAXX0478 - Stoney Creek CAXX0479 - Stony Plain CAXX0480 - Strathroy CAXX0481 - Sturgeon Falls CAXX0482 - Sudbury CAXX0483 - Summerland CAXX0484 - Summerside CAXX0485 - Surrey CAXX0584 - Swan River CAXX0486 - Swift Current CAXX0487 - Sydney CAXX0488 - Sydney Mines CAXX0489 - Sylvan Lake CAXX0490 - Taber CAXX0491 - Taylor CAXX0492 - Tecumseh CAXX0493 - Terrace CAXX0494 - The Pas CAXX0495 - Thompson CAXX0496 - Thornbury CAXX0497 - Thorold CAXX0498 - Thunder Bay CAXX0499 - Tidehead CAXX0500 - Tillsonburg CAXX0501 - Timmins CAXX0502 - Tofino CAXX0503 - Torbay CAXX0504 - Toronto CAXX0505 - Torquay CAXX0506 - Tracy CAXX0507 - Trail CAXX0508 - Trenton CAXX0509 - Trois-Rivieres CAXX0510 - Truro CAXX0511 - Tusket CAXX0512 - Tuxford CAXX0513 - Tyrone CAXX0514 - Ucluelet CAXX0583 - Upsala CAXX0625 - Uranium City CAXX0515 - Usk CAXX0571 - Val Marie Southeast CAXX0516 - Val-d'Or CAXX0517 - Vananda CAXX0518 - Vancouver CAXX0519 - Vassan CAXX0520 - Verdun CAXX0521 - Vermilion CAXX0522 - Veteran CAXX0523 - Victoria CAXX0524 - Virden CAXX0525 - Waasis CAXX0526 - Wabush CAXX0527 - Walcott CAXX0528 - Waldeck CAXX0529 - Waltham Station CAXX0530 - Warman CAXX0585 - Wasagaming CAXX0626 - Waskaganish CAXX0531 - Waterloo CAXX0627 - Watson Lake CAXX0532 - Wawa CAXX0533 - Webb CAXX0534 - Wedgeport CAXX0535 - Welland CAXX0536 - Wembley CAXX0581 - Western Head CAXX0537 - Weyburn CAXX0538 - Whistler CAXX0539 - Whitby CAXX0540 - Whitehorse CAXX0541 - Wiarton CAXX0542 - Williams Lake CAXX0543 - Willow River CAXX0544 - Willowbrook CAXX0545 - Windermere CAXX0546 - Windsor CAXX0547 - Winnipeg CAXX0548 - Wishart CAXX0549 - Witless Bay CAXX0550 - Wolfe Island CAXX0551 - Woodbridge CAXX0552 - Woodstock CAXX0553 - Wymark CAXX0554 - Wynyard CAXX0555 - Yale CAXX0556 - Yarmouth CAXX0557 - Yellowknife CAXX0558 - Yorkton CAXX0559 - Zehner
5 Replies Reply 30 Referrals

 
Page 1 of 2